|
The "no net increase" of water
demand policy has been rescheduled for the next
meeting of the Monterey County Board of
Supervisors, which will be held Tuesday, September
15, 1998 at 3:45 p.m. This gives you another
opportunity to contact your Supervisor and request
that he/she deny the amendment to the Subdivision
Ordinance.
The following was emailed to
LandWatch members originally on September 4,
1998:
On September 15, 1998, the
Monterey County Board of Supervisors will consider
amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance, which
would allow the transfer of water rights from
agricultural lands to subdivision developments, in
an attempt to reach a "no net increase" of water
demand within North Monterey County.
LandWatch has submitted the
following letter to the Board of Supervisors
opposing the amendment to the Subdivision
Ordinance. LandWatch requests that you contact your
Supervisor and urge him/her to oppose this
amendment.
Supervisor Simon
Salinias
email: mocosd1@moco.monterey.ca.us
Supervisor Judy Pennycook
email: mocosd2@moco.monterey.ca.us
Supervisor Tom Perkins
email: mocosd3@moco.monterey.ca.us
Supervisor Edith Johnson
email: mocosd4@moco.monterey.ca.us
Supervisor David Potter
email: mocosd5@ix.netcom.com
Fax: 755-5888
September 4,
1998
Monterey County Board of
Supervisors
Chair Dave Potte
1200 Aguajito Rd., Suite 001
Monterey, CA 93940
Dear Honorable
Supervisors:
LandWatch Monterey County
strongly opposes the proposed amendment to the
Subdivision Ordinance which would allow offsets in
water demand from subdivision developments to
result in a "no net increase" of water within the
North Monterey County Hydrogeologic Study Area. By
allowing the transfer of water rights, this
precedent-setting policy would accelerate the
conversion of agricultural lands to residential
development.
We urge the Board of Supervisors
to deny this policy based on the unanimous
recommendation of the Planning Commission and the
following facts:
- The policy is inconsistent
with the existing General Plan.
- There is insufficient
analysis of the impacts of this policy on
agricultural lands.
- No determination has been
made as to the intended use of the retired lands
and how much land is appropriate to retire.
- The proposed ordinance does
not define the "variety of mitigation methods"
that will be used to quantify the water
offsets.
- You will delegate to the
Monterey County Water Resources Agency
discretionary review over significant land use
decisions.
- There has been virtually no
effort to advise the public about this very
important public policy decision.
- This is a significant action
affecting environmental quality. The negative
environmental declaration ignores the impacts of
this policy.
If approved, the "no net
increase" of water policy will set a substantial
precedent throughout Monterey County. The
developers of both the Moro Cojo and September
Ranch projects have requested water rights for
their projects through the retirement of
agricultural lands. These requests have been
addressed at the project level without sufficient
analysis of the broader implication on land use. If
the County wishes to contemplate this policy
further, we encourage you to prepare an
environmental impact report as required by the
California Environmental Quality Act. This report
should address the cumulative impacts of the policy
on the conversion of agricultural lands.
LandWatch encourages the Board
of Supervisor to deny the amendment to the
Subdivision Ordinance and any future projects that
rely on the "no net increase" policy. These include
any retirements of agricultural land that would
provide water offsets for residential subdivisions,
such as September Ranch.
Thank you for this opportunity
to comment. If you have any questions regarding
LandWatch's position, please contact Donna Kaufman
at (831)375-3752.
Sincerely,
Michael DeLapa
President, LandWatch
|