landwatch logo   Home Issues & Actions About

Archive Page
This page is available as an archive to previous versions of LandWatch websites.

KUSP LandWatch News
January 19, 2015 to January 23, 2015

 

KUSP provided a brief Land Use Report on KUSP Radio from January 2003 to May 2016. Archives of past transcripts are available here.

January 19, 2015 to January 23, 2015

The following Land Use Reports have been presented on KUSP Radio by Gary A. Patton. The Wittwer & Parkin law firm is located in Santa Cruz, California, and practices environmental and governmental law. As part of its practice, the law firm files litigation and takes other action on behalf of its clients, which are typically private individuals, governmental agencies, environmental organizations, or community groups. Whenever the Land Use Report comments on an issue with which the Wittwer & Parkin law firm is involved on behalf of a client, Mr. Patton will make this relationship clear, as part of his commentary. Mr. Patton’s comments do not represent the views of Wittwer & Parkin, LLP, KUSP Radio, nor of any of its sponsors.

Gary Patton's Land Use Links

 

First District Goes Facebook
Monday, January 19, 2015

Our representative form of government will work correctly only if we, the represented, are actually in contact with the officials we have chosen to represent us. Representative democracy is not solely, or maybe even best, characterized by the process of “voting.” On a holiday celebrating the life of Martin Luther King, Jr., whose accomplishments definitely include a major responsibility for enactment of the federal Voting Rights Act that helped enfranchise millions of black Americans, let me say that voting is necessary but not sufficient.

Actual, personal contact and communication with our elected officials is needed. The smaller the governmental unit, of course, the easier that is to accomplish. Because Santa Cruz County is the smallest county in the state, geographically, it is relatively easy to meet your County Supervisor. It’s a bit harder in the much larger Monterey County. We need to make the effort. And our elected officials need to reach out, too. Recently, Santa Cruz County First District Supervisor John Leopold announced a Facebook page, as a way of reaching out. Other Supervisors also have them. Check them out. That kind of digital contact is all to the good, but it’s not sufficient, either. Get in personal touch with your representatives. “Touch” means you could touch them. You might have to go to some meetings!

This is Gary Patton.

More Information

Tonight, Meet At The Grange
Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Water supply planning is underway in the Soquel Creek Water District, and in the City of Santa Cruz. The Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency is also deeply engaged in planning and implementing measures to achieve a safe and sustainable future water supply. And let’s add the San Lorenzo Valley Water District and the Scotts Valley Water District. And of course most listeners will be aware of the kind of water supply planning going on in Monterey County. The State of California has stepped up, too, with a new law focused on water supply planning for groundwater resources.

Planning for future water supplies is a major governmental challenge, and the plans adopted and implemented around the Monterey Bay will have profound environmental and economic impacts. For those specifically affected by the plans of the City of Santa Cruz Water Department, be aware of a meeting scheduled for this evening, Tuesday, January 20th, from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. at the Live Oak Grange, located at 1900 17th Avenue.

Live Oak Neighbors and the Live Oak Grange are co-sponsoring this meeting, at which residents can learn about what the City of Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee is doing. Sue Holt, a member of that Committee, was specifically appointed to represent the Live Oak Area, and she will be there to engage Live Oak residents on the issues that will be directly affecting them.

This is Gary Patton.

More Information:

Litigation And Land Use
Wednesday, January 21, 2015

When not recording the Land Use Report, I am an environmental attorney (and I also teach in the Legal Studies Program at the University of California at Santa Cruz). Because I am an actively practicing lawyer, I suspect that many people might assume that I am an enthusiastic promoter of litigation, as the best way to address land use policy and project matters.  

Actually, that’s not true! Today, tomorrow, and Friday I am going to make specific reference to recently concluded and recently initiated litigation in Monterey County, but I want to lead off with an observation that may be surprising to some listeners. Our system of government discourages the use of the courts to make important land use policy decisions. On any substantive issue, the courts are supposed to “defer” to the land use decisions of elected officials and governmental agencies if there is “any” substantial evidence that would uphold the decision made by the government.

Judges do NOT substitute their judgment for the judgment exercised by elected officials. Even if there is overwhelming evidence that a development would have adverse impacts, as an example, the courts will allow the development to go forward if there is “any” substantial evidence that would justify a decision in favor of the development.

Public participation, in other words, not litigation, is the best way to get the land use decisions you want!

This is Gary Patton.

More Information:

Litigation And Land Use #2
Thursday, January 22, 2015

Good morning! This is Day Two of some remarks about litigation and land use. As I said yesterday, public participation, not litigation, is the best way to get the land use decisions you want. Promoting public participation, of course, is the “unhidden agenda” of the Land Use Report. Land use decisions have a big impact on our future, and becoming personally involved is your best way to have an impact on land use policy and project decisions.

That said, let’s not discount the importance of land use litigation. Litigation can play an incredibly important role in making sure that governmental land use decisions represent the public interest.

I decided to talk about litigation and land use when I found out that two different lawsuits have been filed, challenging the recent approval of the Ferrini Ranch development by the Monterey County Board of Supervisors. Both LandWatch Monterey County and the Highway 68 Coalition have filed lawsuits against this development approval, but those who have been following the debate will remember that both groups have gone to court not as their first response to what they think is a bad project approval, but as a last resort.

That’s the right way to do it, and in fact, the courts actually require project opponents to have “exhausted their administrative remedies” before they come to court.

Tomorrow, I’ll comment on the claims made in the lawsuits.

This is Gary Patton.

More Information:

Litigation And Land Use #3
Friday, January 23, 2015

LandWatch Monterey County and the Highway 68 Coalition have filed lawsuits challenging the approval of the Ferrini Ranch development by the Monterey County Board of Supervisors. As approved, the project would create 185 new homesites along Highway 68. Retiring Supervisor Lou Calcagno cast the deciding vote, in one of his last official decisions.

The lawsuits claim a violation of the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA. CEQA doesn’t mandate any particular decision when a development project is considered, but it does require a fully adequate analysis of all of the impacts of a proposed project. That kind of analysis did not occur, according to LandWatch and the Highway 68 Coalition. In a non-CEQA challenge, LandWatch also charges that the development is in direct violation of General Plan requirements relating to proof of water.

The challengers will have the burden of proof, and the courts will “defer” to the Board’s decision, if there is “any” substantial evidence that the Board complied with the law. These lawsuits are not automatic winners. The County should be advised though, that if they do lose, the County may end up paying the attorneys’ fees of the challengers. Recent reports say that the County has to pay LandWatch over $400,000 in connection with an earlier lawsuit on the County General Plan.

This is Gary Patton.

More Information:

Archives of past transcripts are available here


LandWatch's mission is to protect Monterey County's future by addressing climate change, community health, and social inequities in housing and infrastructure. By encouraging greater public participation in planning, we connect people to government, address human needs and inspire conservation of natural resources.

 

CONTACT

306 Capitol Street #101
Salinas, CA 93901


PO Box 1876
Salinas, CA 93902-1876


Phone (831) 759-2824


Fax (831) 759-2825

 

NAVIGATION

Home

Issues & Actions

About

Donate