|
KUSP provides
a brief Land Use Report on KUSP Radio. Tune in every weekday at 6:33 or 8:49 am.
KUSP is at 88.9 FM in General Coverage, 105.9 FM in Big Sur Valley, 91.3 FM in
Palo Colorado Canyon, and 91.7 FM in San Ardo. Archives of past transcripts are
available here.
Week
of September 15, 2003 to September 19, 2003
- Monday,
September 16, 2003 The GPU Refinement Group
- Tuesday,
September 16, 2003 Cannery Row
- Wednesday,
September 17, 2003 Marina Heights Tomorrow
- Thursday,
September 18, 2003 Action Pajaro Valley
- Friday,
September 19, 2003 LAFCO Next Monday
The following Land Use Reports have been presented on KUSP Radio by Gary Patton, Executive Director of LandWatch Monterey County. The opinions expressed by Mr. Patton are not necessarily those of KUSP Radio, nor of any of its sponsors.
Monday,
September 16, 2003 The GPU Refinement Group
If you were of high school age or older in the 1960s, I imagine
youll remember that song by the Lovin Spoonful,
which focused specifically on the nature of the decision-making
process:
Sometimes
you really dig a girl, the minute youve kissed her; but then
you get distracted by her older sister
Her daddy comes in and
takes you aside, and says, son, you better go home and make up your
mind.
In
the land use realm in Monterey County, the time for some major decisions
has arrived. Growth pressures are pushing up against the limited
natural resources and scarce financial resources of the county.
Deciding how to deal with those growth pressures is really what
the General Plan Update is all about.
Tomorrow,
the Board of Supervisors will consider procedural issues related
to its General Plan Update. In June, the Board created a so-called
Refinement Group, hoping that group could find some
way to eliminate differences of opinion on the current draft document.
As it turned out, that didnt happen. Citizen groups want future
growth to be tightly focused in existing urban areas. Business groups
and large landowners want what they call flexibility,
to build housing and other projects in rural areas. This kind of
difference of opinion really does demand a choice, and elected officials
are the ones who have to make up their mind. No group
of special interest representatives can take them off the hook.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Monterey
County Board of Supervisors Agenda
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/suagenda/agenda.html
Preliminary
Draft of General Plan Update
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/gpu/Reports/0403/
Refinement
Group Report:
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/gpu/news/MONTEREY%20
COUNTY%20BOARD%20OF%20SUPERVISORS.pdf
Tuesday,
September 16, 2003 Cannery Row
Last Saturday (and only about a block from the LandWatch office,
as a matter of fact), Oprah Winfrey was in Salinas to tape part
of an upcoming show, celebrating the writings of John Steinbeck.
Monterey County is still Steinbeck Country, but if youd
like to see Steinbeck Country in a somewhat still recognizable
form, Id suggest an earlier rather than a later visit.
Two
weeks ago, for instance, I saw the famous Red Pony Barn,
featured in one of Steinbecks most endearing stories. The
barn is located in the rolling hills off San Juan Grade Road. I
was there not as a literary tourist, but to make a site visit with
the Planning Commission. This old and picturesque barn is dead center
in the middle of the biggest residential development ever proposed
in unincorporated Monterey County, the so-called Rancho San
Juan development.
On
the other side of Salinas, in the little town of Spreckels, which
looks like a stage set for a Steinbeck reenactment, Tainimura and
Antle, the largest agricultural grower in the Salinas Valley, is
proposing to pave over some of its farmland with a residential subdivision,
that would be immediately adjacent to historic Spreckels.
Tonight,
at the Monterey City Council meeting, you can find out about efforts
to preserve the historic qualities of Cannery Row, another Steinbeck
favorite place. Suffice it to say that many of the business owners
there are not very supportive of any regulation to protect its historic
character.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Oprah
Winfrey Website
http://www.oprah.com/
Monterey
City Website
http://www.monterey.org/
City
Council Agenda for September 16th
http://www.monterey.org/ccncl/agendas/2003/a030916.pdf
Rancho
San Juan Specific Plan
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/pbi/major/rsj/rsj_main.htm
Wednesday,
September 17, 2003 Marina Heights Tomorrow
Marina Heights, the largest single development project ever proposed
in the City of Marina, will be heard before the Marina Planning
Commission tomorrow night at 6:30 p.m. If approved, the Marina Heights
Project would result in the demolition of 828 existing homes. Those
existing homes would be replaced with 1,050 new homes, and 80% of
the new homes would be sold at prices in excess of half a million
dollars apiece.
The
alternative of retaining and renovating the existing 828 housing
units is not being given any consideration by the City. In a way,
thats odd, since in an immediately adjacent area, the exact
same kind of houses have been renovated, at the cost of about $30,000
per house. That renovated area is now a fine suburban neighborhood.
The renovated houses are being rented out by the City of Marina
to ordinary working families, and after all the costs are paid,
net income to the City is about $2,000,000 per year.
Again,
this model is not being looked at for the Marina Heights area. The
land on which the Marina Heights Project is proposed is owned by
the public, but the City plans to sell that land to a private developer
for about $10,000,000 of one time income. Why this is preferable
to a development that would produce several million dollars a year,
in perpetuity, is a question that Marina citizens and residents
might want to pursue.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Marina
City Website
http://www.ci.marina.ca.us/
Thursday,
September 18, 2003 Action Pajaro Valley
Those interested in the future of the Pajaro Valley might want to
take in a meeting scheduled for this evening. Tonight at 6:00 oclock,
Action Pajaro Valley will hold its quarterly Advisory Board Meeting.
The meeting will be held at the Kalich Building, 449 Union Street
in Watsonville. This would be a fine chance to learn about the organizations
past work, and to get an update on its current work.
Action
Pajaro Valley is a nonprofit group, formed in 1998. The group brought
together a broad range of civic, business, and environmental leaders,
to forge a common vision for the future of the Pajaro
Valley, on both sides of the River. This is never, and was not in
this case, an easy task. Its fair to say, though, that getting
organized, bringing people together, and working on specific changes
at the local level often does pay off. In the case of Action Pajaro
Valley, at least one payoff came with the Watsonville Urban Limit
Line and Development Timing Initiative, adopted by the voters in
November 2002.
If
youd like to get more information on Action Pajaro Valley,
the meeting tonight is your best chance. But you can use the World
Wide Web, too. Just click on the Land Use Report link at www.kusp.org,
and track down the transcript of todays Report. Send me your
thoughts and comments, too. I really would like to make the Land
Use Report as helpful and informative as possible.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Action
Pajaro Valley Website
http://www.actionpajarovalley.org/
Friday,
September 19, 2003 LAFCO Next Monday
I go out of my way talk about LAFCO, since many people dont
have a very good idea of what LAFCOs do. LAFCO is the acronym for
Local Agency Formation Commission, and theres
a LAFCO in every California county. When the same governmental institution
exists in every county, theres a good chance this is because
the State Legislature said it had to be that way. And thats
true for LAFCO. LAFCOs are really not local agencies. Theyre
state agencies. They operate under state law, and the whole idea
in creating LAFCOs was to bring some order and discipline to local
land use decisions.
It
used to be that cities could decide their own boundaries just by
voting on them. The City of San Jose was renowned for what were
called cherry stem annexations. The City would spot
some land located a mile or more out of town, and vote to annex
that land and the road leading to it, but none of the land in between.
In this way, revenue producing properties were brought into the
city, and the expense of paying for most of the impacts of the remote
development fell to county government. LAFCOs were set up to avoid
that. It says right in the law that theyre supposed to stop
urban sprawl.
If
youd like to see a LAFCO in action, check out www.kusp.org.
Ive provided references to the LAFCO websites for all the
LAFCOs in the Central Coast Region.
For
KUSP, this is Gary Patton.
More
Information:
Monterey
County LAFCO
http://www.co.monterey.ca.us/lafco/Agendas.htm
Santa
Cruz County LAFCO
http://www.santacruzlafco.org/
San
Luis Obispo County LAFCO
http://www.slolafco.com/
Santa
Clara County LAFCO
http://www.santaclara.lafco.ca.gov/
California
Association of LAFCOs
http://www.calafco.org/
State
Law Establishing LAFCO
http://napa.lafco.ca.gov/govcode.htm
Archives
of past transcripts are available here
|