|
March
2, 2004
California
Native Plant Society, Monterey Bay Chapter
Coalition To Protect Housing, Farmlands, Air & Water
League of Women Voters of the Monterey Peninsula
Friends, Artists & Neighbors of Elkhorn Slough
North County Citizens Oversight Coalition
Planning and Conservation League
Concerned Citizens of River Road
Citizens For Responsible Growth
Líderes Comunitarios de Salinas
Prunedale Preservation Alliance
Monterey County Pine Watch
LandWatch Monterey County
Sierra Club, Ventana Chapter
Prunedale Neighbors Group
Carmel Valley Association
Highway 68 Coalition
Oceans Conservancy
The
Honorable Lou Calcagno, Chair
Monterey County Board of Supervisors
240 Church Street
Salinas, CA 93901
RE:
Proposed Monterey County General Plan Update
Dear
Members of the Board:
The
policies contained in the current draft of the GPU fail to implement
the twelve Guiding Objectives upon which the Board of Supervisors
required the Plan to be based. Accordingly, the current draft
of the Monterey County General Plan Update must be modified before
final adoption, if it is to meet these Guiding Objectives.
We
remind you that the Guiding Objectives were developed by the public
during sessions that you initiated; that the Board has never deviated
from the Guiding Objectives; and that the public has relied upon
the Boards commitment to the Guiding Objectives throughout
the four year General Plan process.
In
its current form, the draft GPU would:
We
urge you to make sure that the final plan effectively implements
the twelve Guiding Objectives, which come directly from the public.
| Unless
we effectively target growth, our quality of life will worsen.
Traffic congestion, water quality and air quality will continue
to deteriorate. |
Guiding
Objective #2 says that the GPU should "identify land that
is adequate and appropriate for the residential, commercial, and
industrial development needs of Monterey County during the next
twenty years
."
In
fact, the current draft of the GPU would stimulate growth and
development far in excess of predicted needs. It identifies land
that would allow more than three times the amount of residential
growth that the Association of Monterey Bay Areas Governments
predicts. Vastly more land is given over for development than
is "needed."
More
growth means more traffic, more pressure on our scarce affordable
housing supply, more damage to our natural resources, and more
water overdraft.
The
current draft GPU is a "big growth" plan that puts the
interests of the developers ahead of the interest of the public.
This needs to be corrected, before final adoption.
| We
need a better General Plan Updateone that preserves
our precious natural resources such as the Elkhorn Slough,
Monterey Bay, and Big Sur for future generations. |
Guiding
Objective #9 says that the GPU should "provide long-term
protection of identified resource-rich and critical habitat areas."
In
fact, the current draft of the GPU would weaken existing
environmental standards:
-
It
allows development on steep slopes, now protected by current
policy
- It
opens up sensitive areas to commercial development without permit
review
-
It
weakens the policies that protect our coast
Before
final adoption, the draft GPU must be modified to strengthen,
not weaken, the policies that that protect the air, land, and
water resources of Monterey County.
| We
support development in Monterey Countys incorporated
cities, and in the communities of Boronda, Castroville,
Pajaro, and Fort Ord to boost our affordable housing supply.
The current draft GPU doesnt create enough housing
that is affordable for the majority of workers and residents. |
Guiding
Objective #4 says that the GPU should "strongly encourage
new commercial, industrial, and residential development to provide
actual, new, permanently affordable living quarters, including
housing for people with low, very low, and moderate incomes who
live and/or are employed in Monterey County
."
In
fact, the current draft fails to achieve this objective. Much
stronger affordable housing policies need to be made part of this
plan, before final adoption.
| The
Board of Supervisors has spent more than four yearsand
more than $4 million dollarsdeveloping a draft GPU
that does not reflect the publics priorities. If the
Board continues to represent special interestsand
not the publics interestthen voters may need
to take control of managing growth and development in the
County. |
The
policies presented in the latest draft of the GPU are worse than
those presented four years ago, and the process has been fiscally
irresponsible.
Before
final adoption, the GPU needs to be modified to justify the time
and expense that have gone into it. It needs, most simply, actually
to achieve the twelve Guiding Objectives upon which it is
supposed to be based.
The
groups that have signed this letter have been part of the public
process since the beginning. We urge the Board of Supervisors
to keep faith with the public. Adding various special treatments
for special interests is simply not acceptable!
We
intend to appear before the Planning Commission, in its upcoming
hearings, and to make specific suggestions on how the current
draft GPU should be modified, to conform to the twelve Guiding
Objectives.
We
urge your Boards early involvement in this processbecause
in the end, it will be the Boards responsibility to make
sure that the new General Plan will:
-
Protect
our air, land, and water resources, our coast, and the incomparable
natural treasures of Monterey County, like Big Sur, Arroyo Seco,
and the Elkhorn Slough
-
Provide
permanently affordable housing opportunities for local
residents, including those with very low, low, and moderate
incomes
-
Allow
for the growth that is needed, without opening up Monterey County
to the outside growth pressures that threaten our agricultural
economy, our natural resources, the financial capabilities of
our local governments, and our quality of life
Thank
you for taking our comments seriously. We look to you for leadership.
The twelve Guiding Objectives adopted by your Board should continue
to be your guide.
Gary
A. Patton,
LandWatch Monterey County |
Marit
Evans and Mike Weaver,
Highway 68 Coalition |
Mari
Kloeppel,Friends,
Artists & Neighbors of Elkhorn Slough |
John
Dalessio,
Carmel Valley Association |
Carolyn
Anderson,
North County Citizens Oversight Coalition |
Gillian
Taylor,
Sierra Club, Ventana Chapter |
Beverly
G. Bean,
League of Women Voters, Monterey Peninsula |
VMD
Doug Fay,
Concerned Citizens of River Road |
Lidia
Rodriguez,
Líderes Comunitarios de Salinas |
Kaitlin
Gaffney,
Oceans Conservancy |
Fred
Keeley,
Planning and Conservation League |
Jan
Mitchell,
Prunedale Neighbors Group |
Howard
Classen,
Coalition To Protect Housing, Farmlands, Air & Water |
David
Bates,
Monterey County Pine Watch |
Bill
Theyskens,
Prunedale Preservation Alliance |
Alex
Urciuoli,
Citizens For Responsible Growth |
Mary
Ann Matthews,
California Native Plant Society, Monterey Bay Chapter |
|
| cc: |
Monterey
County Planning Commission
Monterey County GPU Staff
County Administrative Officer
County Planning Director |
[Return
to County Plan Update Issues and Actions]
posted
03.03.04
|